Programmable logic controllers (PLC) and programmable automation controllers (PAC) are two types of industrial controllers used to automate processes and machines in manufacturing, processing, and other industrial applications. Both types of controllers have similar functions, but there are also significant differences between them.
In this article, we will take about the differences, similarities, and examples of PLC and PAC.
Contents:
PLC stands for Programmable Logic Controller, which is a specialized industrial computer used for automation control systems. PLC is designed to operate in harsh environments and are used to control machinery in manufacturing plants, assembly lines, and other industrial settings.
PLC can be programmed using 5 different languages such as ladder logic, function block diagrams, structure text, instruction list, and sequential charts. These 5 languages are approved and applied as per the IEC 61131-3 standards.
PAC stands for Programmable Automation Controller, which is similar to a PLC but has more advanced functionality. PAC combines the capabilities of a traditional PLC with the ability to perform much more complicated tasks and communicate with other devices and systems, making them more flexible and powerful than PLC.
PAC is typically used for more complex automation and control applications in industries such as automotive, aerospace, and power generation. PAC can be programmed using the same 5 languages as PLC but also they can be programmed using C and C++, giving them the ability to handle coding more complex algorithms.
The similarities between PLC are PAC are too many that it is difficult sometimes to tell if they are even different. Although there is still some difference between them.
The similarities they share can be even more. Here are some of the common points between PLC and PAC:
Both PLC and PAC are designed to provide reliable and accurate control of industrial automation systems. They are used to monitor inputs from sensors and other devices, process the information, and then output control signals to actuators and other equipment.
Both PLC and PAC use programming languages to create control logic that determines the behavior of the automation system. They share the 5 programming languages defined in the IEC 61131-3 standards, but PAC offer more programming language options including C and C++.
Both PLC and PAC are built to withstand harsh industrial environments, such as temperature extremes, humidity, and vibration. They are designed to be rugged and reliable, with long lifetimes and lower maintenance requirements.
Both PLC and PAC have a modular design, which allows for easy expansion and customization. Modules can be added or removed to meet specific requirements.
Both PLC and PAC are built to meet industry standards for automation and control systems, such as IEC 61131. These standards ensure interoperability between devices and systems from different manufacturers.
The distinction between PAC and PLC can be somewhat blurry. While there is no definition of what constitutes a PAC, there are some common characteristics that differentiate PAC from PLC:
While both PLC and PAC are used for automation and control applications, PAC have more advanced functionality such as motion control, process control, and data acquisition. PAC also typically have more processing power and memory than PLC.
PAC have more advanced connectivity options than PLC, including Ethernet, USB, and wireless. This makes it easier to integrate them into larger automation systems and to communicate with other devices and systems.
Because of their more advanced functionality and flexibility, PAC are generally more expensive than PLC.
PAC often have more advanced software features than PLC, such as integrated motion control, data logging, and advanced diagnostic tools. These features make it easier for engineers and technicians to monitor and troubleshoot the control system.
Siemens S7-1500 PLC:
This is a high-performance PLC from Siemens, one of the leading automation vendors. It is designed for demanding applications and offers advanced functions such as motion control, safety, and security. See picture 1.
Allen-Bradley CompactLogix 5370 PLC:
This is a versatile PLC from Rockwell Automation that offers a wide range of I/O options and communication protocols. It is suitable for a variety of applications, including machine control and process automation. See picture 2.
Mitsubishi Electric Q Series PLC:
This is a reliable PLC from Mitsubishi Electric that offers high-speed processing, flexible I/O options, and advanced programming capabilities. It is suitable for a variety of applications, including automotive, food and beverage, and pharmaceuticals. See picture 3.
Omron NJ Series PLC:
This is a high-speed, high-performance PLC from Omron that offers advanced motion control and network capabilities. It is suitable for a variety of applications, including packaging, printing, and semiconductor manufacturing. See picture 4.
Beckhoff TwinCAT PLC:
This is a software-based PLC from Beckhoff that runs on a PC-based platform. It offers advanced functions such as motion control, CNC, and robotics, and is suitable for a variety of applications, including machine control and process automation. See picture 5.
Emerson DeltaV DCS PAC:
This is a distributed control system (DCS) PAC from Emerson. It is designed for complex continuous control applications and offers advanced functions such as process modeling, batch management, and advanced control. See picture 6.
Schneider Electric Modicon M340 PAC:
This is a high-performance PAC from Schneider Electric that offers advanced functions such as motion control, safety, and cybersecurity. It is suitable for a variety of applications, including energy, water treatment, and mining. See picture 7.
Some other examples of PAC are as follows:
PLC and PAC are used in different types of automation applications depending on the specific requirements of that application. Here are some general guidelines on where a PLC is best fit and where a PAC is the best fit:
PLCs are best suited for applications that involve discrete control, such as controlling the operation of a conveyor, sorting equipment, or packaging machinery.
PLCs are ideal for applications that have a relatively simple control system that can be programmed using ladder logic or other similar programming languages.
PLCs are generally less expensive than PACs, which makes them a good choice for applications where cost is a significant factor.
PLCs are suitable for small to medium-sized control systems, where the number of inputs and outputs is relatively low.
A conveyor system in a manufacturing plant is a good example of an automation system where a PLC is the best fit. In this application, the PLC is responsible for controlling the speed and direction of the conveyor, as well as monitoring the status of sensors and other equipment along the conveyor line. The PLC can also be programmed to handle specific production tasks such as sorting, counting, or packing.
A conveyor system typically has a fixed structure and a well-defined set of operations that need to be executed in a sequential manner. PLC are well-suited for this type of application because they are designed to handle discrete control tasks and are very reliable in their operation. PLC can be easily programmed and configured to handle different types of sensors, actuators, and communication protocols.
PAC best suited for applications that involve process control, such as controlling the operation of a chemical plant, water treatment plant, or power plant.
PAC ideal for applications that have a complex control system that requires advanced algorithms and optimization functions.
PAC suitable for large-scale control systems, where the number of inputs and outputs is high and the system is distributed over a large area.
PAC capable of handling high-performance applications that require fast data processing, real-time control, and high reliability.
A power plant control system is a good example of an automation system where a PAC is the best fit. In this application, the PAC is responsible for controlling and monitoring a large number of complex processes and equipment, such as turbines, generators, boilers, and pumps. The PAC is also responsible for collecting and analyzing data from various sensors and other sources and making decisions based on that data to optimize the plant’s performance.
A power plant control system is a very complex and dynamic environment, with many different processes and equipment operating simultaneously. PAC are well-suited for this type of application because they offer advanced functions such as distributed control, redundancy, and fault tolerance, which are essential for ensuring the reliability and safety of the plant. PAC can handle large amounts of data and can be programmed to perform complex algorithms and optimization tasks.
If you liked this article, then please subscribe to our YouTube Channel for Instrumentation, Electrical, PLC, and SCADA video tutorials.
You can also follow us on Facebook and Twitter to receive daily updates.
Read Next:
Learn an example PLC program to control a pump based on level sensors using ladder…
In the PLC timer application for security camera recording, when motion is detected then camera…
In this example, we will learn batch mixing with PLC ladder logic program using timer…
This PLC example on manufacturing line assembly is an intermediate-level PLC program prepared for the…
In this article, you will learn the PLC programming example with pushbutton and motor control…
This article teaches how to convert Boolean logic to PLC programming ladder logic with the…