Inst ToolsInst ToolsInst Tools
  • Courses
  • Automation
    • PLC
    • Control System
    • Safety System
    • Communication
    • Fire & Gas System
  • Instrumentation
    • Design
    • Pressure
    • Temperature
    • Flow
    • Level
    • Vibration
    • Analyzer
    • Control Valve
    • Switch
    • Calibration
    • Erection & Commissioning
  • Interview
    • Instrumentation
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Practical
  • Q&A
    • Instrumentation
    • Control System
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Analog Electronics
    • Digital Electronics
    • Power Electronics
    • Microprocessor
Search
  • Books
  • Software
  • Projects
  • Process
  • Tools
  • Basics
  • Formula
  • Power Plant
  • Root Cause Analysis
  • Electrical Basics
  • Animation
  • Standards
  • 4-20 mA Course
  • Siemens PLC Course
Reading: Probability of Failure on Demand (PFD)
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Inst ToolsInst Tools
Font ResizerAa
  • Courses
  • Design
  • PLC
  • Interview
  • Control System
Search
  • Courses
  • Automation
    • PLC
    • Control System
    • Safety System
    • Communication
    • Fire & Gas System
  • Instrumentation
    • Design
    • Pressure
    • Temperature
    • Flow
    • Level
    • Vibration
    • Analyzer
    • Control Valve
    • Switch
    • Calibration
    • Erection & Commissioning
  • Interview
    • Instrumentation
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Practical
  • Q&A
    • Instrumentation
    • Control System
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Analog Electronics
    • Digital Electronics
    • Power Electronics
    • Microprocessor
Follow US
All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Inst Tools > Blog > Safety Instrumented System (SIS) > Probability of Failure on Demand (PFD)

Probability of Failure on Demand (PFD)

Last updated: March 22, 2019 10:52 am
Editorial Staff
Safety Instrumented System (SIS)
No Comments
Share
4 Min Read
SHARE

Reliability, as previously defined, is the probability a component or system will perform as designed. Like all probability values, reliability is expressed a number ranging between 0 and 1, inclusive.

A reliability value of zero (0) means the component or system is totally unreliable (i.e. it is guaranteed to fail). Conversely, a reliability value of one (1) means the component or system is completely reliable (i.e. guaranteed to properly function).

In the context of dependability (i.e. the probability that a safety component or system will function when called upon to act), the unreliability of that component or system is referred to as PFD, an acronym standing for Probability of Failure on Demand.

Probability of Failure on Demand

Probability of failure on demand (PFD)

Like dependability, this is also a probability value ranging from 0 to 1, inclusive. A PFD value of zero (0) means there is no probability of failure (i.e. it is 100% dependable – guaranteed to properly perform when needed), while a PFD value of one (1) means it is completely undependable (i.e. guaranteed to fail when activated).

Thus:

Dependability + PFD = 1

PFD = 1 − Dependability

Dependability = 1 − PFD

Obviously, a system designed for high dependability should exhibit a small PFD value (very nearly 0). Just how low the PFD needs to be is a function of how critical the component or system is to the fulfillment of our human needs.

The degree to which a system must be dependable in order to fulfill our modern expectations is often surprisingly high. Suppose someone were to tell you the reliability of seat-belts in a particular automobile was 99.9 percent (0.999).

This sounds rather good, doesn’t it? However, when you actually consider the fact that this degree of probability would mean an average of one failed seat-belt for every 1000 collisions, the results are seen to be rather poor (at least to modern American standards of expectation). If the dependability of seat-belts is 0.999, then the PFD is 0.001:

PFD = 1 − Dependability

PFD = 1 − 0.999

PFD = 0.001

Let’s suppose an automobile manufacturer sets a goal of only 1 failed seatbelt in any of its cars during a 1 million unit production run, assuming each and every one of these cars were to crash.

Assuming four seatbelts per car, this equates to a 1/4000000 PFD. The necessary dependability of this manufacturer’s seatbelts must therefore be:

Dependability = 1 − PFD = 1 − (1/4000000)  =  0.99999975

Thus, the dependability of these seatbelts must be 99.999975% in order to fulfill the goal of only 1 (potential) seatbelt failure out of 4 million seatbelts produced.

A common order-of-magnitude expression of desired reliability is the number of “9” digits in the reliability value. A reliability value of 99.9% would be expressed as “three nine’s” and a reliability value of 99.99% as “four nine’s.”

Expressed thusly, the seatbelt dependability must be “six nine’s” in order to achieve the automobile manufacturer’s goal.

Articles You May Like :

SIS Interview Questions

Failure in Safety Control Circuit

What is Safety Control System ?

What is intrinsic safety ?

SIS Plant Example

Don't Miss Our Updates
Be the first to get exclusive content straight to your email.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
You've successfully subscribed !

Continue Reading

Difference between Process shutdown and Emergency Shutdown
Understanding Emergency Shutdown Button Installation (ESD)
Why choose Intrinsic Safety ?
Control Valve Failure Rate Calculation
What is Emergency Shutdown System (ESD) ?
Energize to Safe Loop philosophy
Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Copy Link
Share
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

128.3kFollowersLike
69.1kFollowersFollow
208kSubscribersSubscribe
38kFollowersFollow

Categories

Explore More

SIS Audit & Assessment – Safety Instrumented System
Transmitter Proof Testing
Failure rate and MTBF of Safety Instrumented Systems
SIS Solenoid Valves – Safety PLC
SIS Hardware Fault Tolerance – Methods to Overcome HFT issues
SIS Component Selection – Safety Instrumented System
Concept of Redundancy in Control Systems
Difference between Availability, Reliability & SIL

Keep Learning

Typical schematic of Butterfly valve

Automated Block Valve (ABV)

SIS Failures and Reliability - Safety Instrumented Systems

SIS Failures and Reliability – Safety Instrumented Systems

HIPPS Operating Philosophy

Understanding High Integrity Pressure Protection Systems (HIPPS)

Reliability of a Control System

Reliability of a Control System

Rupture disks

Rupture disks

safety PLC programming

SIS Logic Solver

de-energized-to-safe-mode

De-energize to Safe Loop philosophy

Common Cause Failure in Safety Instrumented System

Common Cause Failure – Safety Instrumented System

Learn More

MTech Project Ideas for Electronics and Electrical Engineering

100 MTech Project Ideas for Electronics and Electrical Engineering

Thermocouple Questions

Thermocouple Terminal block Questions

Simple RC Circuit

Impedance in RC Circuits

SFC Language in PLC Programming

SFC Language in PLC Programming

Air Release Valve

What is an Air Valve? Purpose, Types, Advantages, Disadvantages

Cybersecurity in PLC

Cybersecurity in PLC

Instrument Calibration Lab Exercise

Instrument Calibration Lab Exercise

Unbalanced Bridge Circuit

Bridge Circuit Construction

Follow US
All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?