Inst ToolsInst ToolsInst Tools
  • Courses
  • Automation
    • PLC
    • Control System
    • Safety System
    • Communication
    • Fire & Gas System
  • Instrumentation
    • Design
    • Pressure
    • Temperature
    • Flow
    • Level
    • Vibration
    • Analyzer
    • Control Valve
    • Switch
    • Calibration
    • Erection & Commissioning
  • Interview
    • Instrumentation
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Practical
  • Q&A
    • Instrumentation
    • Control System
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Analog Electronics
    • Digital Electronics
    • Power Electronics
    • Microprocessor
Search
  • Books
  • Software
  • Projects
  • Process
  • Tools
  • Basics
  • Formula
  • Power Plant
  • Root Cause Analysis
  • Electrical Basics
  • Animation
  • Standards
  • 4-20 mA Course
  • Siemens PLC Course
Reading: Safety Integrity Level (SIL)
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Inst ToolsInst Tools
Font ResizerAa
  • Courses
  • Design
  • PLC
  • Interview
  • Control System
Search
  • Courses
  • Automation
    • PLC
    • Control System
    • Safety System
    • Communication
    • Fire & Gas System
  • Instrumentation
    • Design
    • Pressure
    • Temperature
    • Flow
    • Level
    • Vibration
    • Analyzer
    • Control Valve
    • Switch
    • Calibration
    • Erection & Commissioning
  • Interview
    • Instrumentation
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Practical
  • Q&A
    • Instrumentation
    • Control System
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Analog Electronics
    • Digital Electronics
    • Power Electronics
    • Microprocessor
Follow US
All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Inst Tools > Blog > Safety Instrumented System (SIS) > Safety Integrity Level (SIL)

Safety Integrity Level (SIL)

Last updated: October 17, 2023 4:02 pm
Editorial Staff
Safety Instrumented System (SIS)
No Comments
Share
6 Min Read
SHARE

A common way of ranking the dependability of a Safety Instrumented Function (SIF) is to use a simple numerical scale from one to four, with four being extremely dependable and one being only moderately dependable:

Contents
Safety Integrity Level (SIL)Example :

Safety Integrity Level (SIL)

Safety Integrity Level | SIL Ratings

The Required Safety Availability (RSA) value is synonymous with dependability: the probability (Note 1) that a Safety Instrumented Function will perform its duty when faced with a dangerous process condition.

Conversely, the Probability of Failure on Demand (PFD) is synonymous with undependability:

the mathematical complement of RSA (PFD = 1 − RSA),

expressing the probability that the SIF will fail to perform as needed, when needed.

Note 1: Probability is a quantitative measure of a particular outcome’s likelihood. A probability value of 1, or 100%, means the outcome in question is certain to happen. A probability value of 0 (0%) means the outcome is impossible. A probability value of 0.3 (30%) means it will happen an average of three times out of ten.

Conveniently, the SIL number matches the minimum number of “nines” in the Required Safety Availability (RSA) value.

For instance, a safety instrumented function with a Probability of Failure on Demand (PFD) of 0.00073, will have an RSA value of 99.927%, which equates to a SIL 3 rating.

It is important to understand what SIL is, and what SIL is not. The SIL rating refers to the reliability of a safety function, not to individual components of a system nor to the entire process itself.

An over-pressure protection system on a chemical reactor process with a SIL rating of 2, for example, has a Probability of Failure on Demand between 0.01 and 0.001 for the specific shutdown function as a whole.

This PFD value incorporates failure probabilities of the sensor(s), logic solver, final control element(s), and the process piping including the reactor vessel itself plus any relief valves and other auxiliary equipment.

If there arises a need to improve the PFD of this reactor’s over-pressure protection, safety engineers have a variety of options at their disposal for doing so.

The safety instruments themselves might be upgraded, a different redundancy strategy implemented, preventive maintenance schedules increased in frequency, or even process equipment changed to make an over-pressure event less likely.

SIL ratings do not apply to an entire process. It is quite possible that the chemical reactor mentioned in the previous paragraph with an over-pressure protection system SIL rating of 3 might have an over-temperature protection system SIL rating of only 2, due to differences in how the two different safety systems function.

Adding to this confusion is the fact that many instrument manufacturers rate their products as approved for use in certain SIL-rated applications.

It is easy to misunderstand these claims, thinking that a safety instrumented function will be rated at some SIL value simply because instruments rated for that SIL value are used to implement it.

In reality, the SIL value of any safety function is a much more complex determination.

It is possible, for instance, to purchase and install a pressure transmitter rated for use in SIL 2 applications, and have the safety function as a whole be less than 99% reliable (PFD greater than 0.01, or a SIL level no greater than 1) due to the effect of Lusser’s Law (Note 2).

Note 2 : Lusser’s Law of Reliability states that the total reliability of a system dependent on the function of several independent components is the mathematical product of those components’ individual reliabilities.

Example :

A system with three essential components, each of those components having an individual reliability value of 70%, will exhibit a reliability of only 34.3% because 0.7×0.7×0.7 = 0.343.

This is why a safety function may utilize a pressure transmitter rated for use in SIL-3 applications, but exhibit a much lower total SIL rating due to the use of an ordinary final control element.

As with so many other complex calculations in instrumentation engineering, there exist software packages with all the necessary formulae pre-programmed for engineers and technicians alike to use for calculating SIL ratings of safety instrumented functions.

These software tools not only factor in the inherent reliability ratings of different system components, but also correct for preventive maintenance schedules and proof testing intervals so the user may determine the proper maintenance attention required to achieve a given SIL rating.

Read Next:

  • Functional Safety Questions & Answers
  • Probability of failure in Safety Circuit
  • Alarm and Trip Systems
  • What is a Shutdown Valve?
  • SIS Logic Solvers
Don't Miss Our Updates
Be the first to get exclusive content straight to your email.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
You've successfully subscribed !

Continue Reading

Emergency Shutdown Valve : Advantages
Emergency Shutdown System Philosophy
SIS PFD – Safety Instrumented System
What is Process Override Switch (POS)?
SIS Audit & Assessment – Safety Instrumented System
Process Safety and Instrumentation
Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Copy Link
Share
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

128.3kFollowersLike
69.1kFollowersFollow
208kSubscribersSubscribe
38kFollowersFollow

Categories

Explore More

SIS Solenoid Valves – Safety PLC
Safety Instrumented System Probability
SIS Software Simulation – Safety Instrumented System
Safety Instrumented System Module Failure
Probability of Failure on Demand (PFD)
Voting Logic in Safety Instrumented System (SIS)
SIS Instruments and Valves Inline Testing – Safety Instrumented System
What is Proof Testing? – How to do a Proof Test? – Importance, Methods

Keep Learning

pressurized water reactor

SIS Example : Nuclear Reactor Controls

safety control system

Safety Instrumented Burner Management System

Safety Instrumented System Interview Questions Answers

Safety Instrumented System Interview Questions and Answers

SIS Bypass and Impairment - Safety Instrumented System

SIS Bypass and Impairment – Safety Instrumented System

What is HIPPS System in Oil and Gas

What is HIPPS System in Oil and Gas?

Transmitter Proof Testing

Transmitter Proof Testing

S84 - IEC 61511 Standard for Safety Instrumented Systems

S84 / IEC 61511 Standard for Safety Instrumented Systems

transmitters shared for BPCS and SIS

SIS Instrument Sharing – Transmitters Shared for BPCS and SIS Example

Learn More

Float level gauge Principle

Float Type Level Indicator Principle

Process Control Instrumentation Objective Questions

Process Control Instrumentation Quiz

Measurement of Phase Angle Objective Questions

Measurement of Phase Angle Objective Questions

CODESYS HMI Interface

CODESYS HMI Interface

Library of PlantPAx Process Objects

How to Download PlantPAx Library?

Gas Detectors Practical Problems and Troubleshooting

Gas Detectors Practical Problems and Troubleshooting

As-found and As-left Calibration

As-found and As-left Documentation during Calibration

Scintillation Counter Theory

Scintillation Counter Principle

Follow US
All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?