Inst ToolsInst ToolsInst Tools
  • Courses
  • Automation
    • PLC
    • Control System
    • Safety System
    • Communication
    • Fire & Gas System
  • Instrumentation
    • Design
    • Pressure
    • Temperature
    • Flow
    • Level
    • Vibration
    • Analyzer
    • Control Valve
    • Switch
    • Calibration
    • Erection & Commissioning
  • Interview
    • Instrumentation
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Practical
  • Q&A
    • Instrumentation
    • Control System
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Analog Electronics
    • Digital Electronics
    • Power Electronics
    • Microprocessor
Search
  • Books
  • Software
  • Projects
  • Process
  • Tools
  • Basics
  • Formula
  • Power Plant
  • Root Cause Analysis
  • Electrical Basics
  • Animation
  • Standards
  • 4-20 mA Course
  • Siemens PLC Course
Reading: Reliability of a Control System
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Inst ToolsInst Tools
Font ResizerAa
  • Courses
  • Design
  • PLC
  • Interview
  • Control System
Search
  • Courses
  • Automation
    • PLC
    • Control System
    • Safety System
    • Communication
    • Fire & Gas System
  • Instrumentation
    • Design
    • Pressure
    • Temperature
    • Flow
    • Level
    • Vibration
    • Analyzer
    • Control Valve
    • Switch
    • Calibration
    • Erection & Commissioning
  • Interview
    • Instrumentation
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Practical
  • Q&A
    • Instrumentation
    • Control System
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Analog Electronics
    • Digital Electronics
    • Power Electronics
    • Microprocessor
Follow US
All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Inst Tools > Blog > Safety Instrumented System (SIS) > Reliability of a Control System

Reliability of a Control System

Last updated: March 22, 2019 10:51 am
Editorial Staff
Safety Instrumented System (SIS)
No Comments
Share
6 Min Read
SHARE

Reliability (R) is the probability a component or system will perform as designed. Like all probability figures, reliability ranges in value from 0 to 1, inclusive.

Reliability of a Control System

Reliability of a Control System

Given the tendency of manufactured devices to fail over time, reliability decreases with time. During the useful life of a component or system, reliability is related to failure rate by a simple exponential function:

R = e−λt

Where,

R = Reliability as a function of time (sometimes shown as R(t))
e = Euler’s constant (≈ 2.71828)
λ = Failure rate (assumed to be a constant during the useful life period)
t = Time

Knowing that failure rate is the mathematical reciprocal of mean time between failures (MTBF), we may re-write this equation in terms of MTBF as a “time constant” (τ ) for random failures during the useful life period:

R = e−t/MTBF       or         R = e−t/λ

This inverse-exponential function mathematically explains the scenario described earlier where we tested a large batch of components, counting the number of failed components and the number of surviving components over time.

Like the dice experiment where we set aside each “failed” die and then rolled only the remaining “survivors” for the next trial in the test, we end up with a diminishing number of “survivors” as the test proceeds.

The same exponential function for calculating reliability applies to single components as well. Imagine a single component functioning within its useful life period, subject only to random failures.

The longer this component is relied upon, the more time it has to succumb to random faults, and therefore the less likely it is to function perfectly over the duration of its test.

To illustrate by example, a pressure transmitter installed and used for a period of 1 year has a greater chance of functioning perfectly over that service time than an identical pressure transmitter pressed into service for 5 years, simply because the one operating for 5 years has five times more opportunity to fail. In other words, the reliability of a component over a specified time is a function of time, and not just the failure rate (λ).

Using dice once again to illustrate, it is as if we rolled a single six-sided die over and over, waiting for it to “fail” (roll a “1”). The more times we roll this single die, the more likely it will eventually “fail” (eventually roll a “1”). With each roll, the probability of failure is 1/6 , and the probability of survival is 5/6 .

Since survival over multiple rolls necessitates surviving the first roll and and next roll and the next roll, all the way to the last surviving roll, the probability function we should apply here is the “AND” (multiplication) of survival probability.

Therefore, the survival probability after a single roll is 5/6 , while the survival probability for two successive rolls is ( 5/6)2 , the survival probability for three successive rolls is  (5/6)3 , and so on.

The following table shows the probabilities of “failure” and “survival” for this die with an increasing number of rolls:

Control System probabilities of failure and survival

A practical example of this equation in use would be the reliability calculation for a Rosemount model 1151 analog differential pressure transmitter (with a demonstrated MTBF value of 226 years as published by Rosemount) over a service life of 5 years following burn-in:

R = e−5/226

R = 0.9781 = 97.81%

Another way to interpret this reliability value is in terms of a large batch of transmitters. If three hundred Rosemount model 1151 transmitters were continuously used for five years following burn-in (assuming no replacement of failed units), we would expect approximately 293 of them to still be working (i.e. 6.564 random-cause failures) during that five-year period:

Instrument Transmitters Failure

It should be noted that the calculation will be linear rather than inverse-exponential if we assume immediate replacement of failed transmitters (maintaining the total number of functioning units at 300).

If this is the case, the number of random-cause failures is simply 1/226 per year, or 0.02212 per transmitter over a 5-year period. For a collection of 300 (maintained) Rosemount model 1151 transmitters, this would equate to 6.637 failed units over the 5-year testing span:

Number of failed transmitters = (300) ( 5/226) = 6.637

Articles You May Like :

IEC 61511 Standard

Failure Rate Calculation

Burner Management System

Maintenance Override Switch

Layers of Protection Analysis

Don't Miss Our Updates
Be the first to get exclusive content straight to your email.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
You've successfully subscribed !

Continue Reading

What is a Logic Solver? – Safety PLC
Voting Logic in Safety Instrumented System (SIS)
Understanding Safety Integrity Level IEC 61511
ESDV : How it Works ?
SIS Emergency Block Valves (EBV)
Safety Instrumented System Engineer Interview Questions
Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Copy Link
Share
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

128.3kFollowersLike
69.1kFollowersFollow
210kSubscribersSubscribe
38kFollowersFollow

Categories

Explore More

SIS Logic Solver
SIS Software Simulation – Safety Instrumented System
Transistor Failure Rate Calculation
Safety Instrumented System Handbook – SIS Tutorials
Difference between SIS, PLC and BPCS Systems
SIS Hardware Fault Tolerance – Methods to Overcome HFT issues
Safety Integrity Level (SIL)
Proof Testing of Safety Instrumented Systems

Keep Learning

Safety Instrumented System (SIS) Worksheets

Safety Instrumented System (SIS) Worksheets and Documents

Process Safety and Instrumentation

Process Safety and Instrumentation

Common Cause Failure in Safety Instrumented System

Common Cause Failure – Safety Instrumented System

Emergency Shutdown System Philosophy

Shutdown Philosophy

Maintenance Override Switch (MOS)

What is Maintenance Override Switch (MOS) ?

ESD System Insights

ESD System Insights: Signals for Emergency Valve Shutdown Explained

PRV

Direct-actuated Safety and Relief Valves

Safety Instrumented System SIS Component Selection

SIS Component Selection – Safety Instrumented System

Learn More

PLC Program for Automatic Oil and Water Separation Process

Oil and Water Separation Process using PLC Programming

Circuit Breaker Making Capacity

Circuit Breaker Making Capacity

Direct Acting Actuators

Effect of Differential Pressure on Control Valve Lift

Control Valve Plug Stem and Gland Leaks

Repeat Control Valve Plug Stem and Gland Leaks

Circulating Pump

What is a Circulating Pump?

Electromagnetic Fields Objective Questions

Electromagnetic Fields Objective Questions

Preventive Maintenance of Variable Frequency Drive

Preventive Maintenance of Variable Frequency Drive (VFD)

Blast Furnace Panel Modification to Reduce Down Time

Blast Furnace Panel Modification to Reduce Down Time by 60 to 70%

Menu

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright

Quick Links

  • Learn PLC
  • Helping Hand
  • Part Time Job

YouTube Subscribe

Follow US
All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?