Inst ToolsInst ToolsInst Tools
  • Ask
  • Courses
  • Videos
  • Q & A
    • Interview
      • Instrumentation
      • Electronics
      • Electrical
      • Practical Questions
    • MCQ
      • Instrumentation MCQ
      • Electrical MCQ
      • Electronics MCQ
      • Control Systems MCQ
      • Analog Electronics MCQ
      • Digital Electronics MCQ
      • Power Electronics MCQ
      • Microprocessor MCQ
      • Multiple Choice Questions
  • EE
    • Electronics
      • Electronics Q & A
      • Electronic Basics
      • Electronic Devices & Circuits
      • Electronics Animation
      • Digital Electronics
    • Electrical
      • Electrical Basics
      • Electrical Q & A
      • Power Electronics
      • Electrical Machines
      • Electrical Animation
      • Power Systems
      • Switchgear & Protection
      • Transmission & Distribution
  • Measure
    • Control Valves
    • Calibration
    • Temperature
    • Pressure
    • Flow
    • Level
    • Analyzers
    • Switches
    • Vibration
    • Solenoid Valve
  • Control
    • PLC Tutorials
    • Control Systems
    • Safety Instrumented System (SIS)
    • Communication
    • Fire & Gas System
  • More
    • Design
    • Tools
    • Animation
    • Basics
    • Formulas
    • Standards
    • TextBooks
    • Common
    • Software
    • Excel Tools
    • Erection & Commissioning
    • Process Fundamentals
    • Videos
    • Books
Search
All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Reading: How to Calculate Transmitter Performance and Calibration Frequency?
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Inst ToolsInst Tools
Font ResizerAa
  • Courses
  • PLC Tutorials
  • Control Systems
Search
  • Ask
  • Courses
  • Videos
  • Q & A
    • Interview
    • MCQ
  • EE
    • Electronics
    • Electrical
  • Measure
    • Control Valves
    • Calibration
    • Temperature
    • Pressure
    • Flow
    • Level
    • Analyzers
    • Switches
    • Vibration
    • Solenoid Valve
  • Control
    • PLC Tutorials
    • Control Systems
    • Safety Instrumented System (SIS)
    • Communication
    • Fire & Gas System
  • More
    • Design
    • Tools
    • Animation
    • Basics
    • Formulas
    • Standards
    • TextBooks
    • Common
    • Software
    • Excel Tools
    • Erection & Commissioning
    • Process Fundamentals
    • Videos
    • Books
Follow US
All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Inst Tools > Blog > Instrumentation Design > How to Calculate Transmitter Performance and Calibration Frequency?

How to Calculate Transmitter Performance and Calibration Frequency?

Last updated: September 28, 2022 12:40 pm
Jatin Katrodiya
Instrumentation Design
1 Comment
Share
6 Min Read
SHARE

The overall performance of the transmitter is defined by the Total Probable Error (TPE).

Contents
Transmitter Calibration Frequency1. Reference accuracy2. Ambient temperature effects3. Line Pressure EffectsExample:Yokogawa TransmitterReference Accuracy of Calibrated SpanAmbient Temperature Effects on TransmitterStatic Pressure EffectsOverPressure EffectsStabilityTotal Probable Error (TPE)Calibration FrequencyTotal AccuracyEmerson TransmitterHoneywell TransmitterConclusion:Read Next:

TPE is the accuracy of the instrument in installed/actual conditions.

Transmitter Calibration Frequency

Transmitter Performance and Calibration Frequency

TPE is made up of four things:

1. Reference accuracy

This is to be calculated at calibrated Span.

2. Ambient temperature effects

Transmitters are factory calibrated at room temperature. If a transmitter operates at a different ambient temperature, the electronics perform differently, and a measurement error may result.)

3. Line Pressure Effects

Line pressure effect errors occur when diaphragms are altered under static pressure. Normally Manufacturers will define the performance affected due to every 1000 PSIG pressure changes.

There is zero and span effect due to static Line pressure. some vendor claims that zero effect can be eliminated by Zero Trim when it is performed under static pressure condition.

4. Some manufacturer defines Transmitter performance is affected by Overpressure up to 250 bar.

If the performance does not meet the minimum requirements, then the transmitter might not be a good fit for the application.

The below sample calculation performed to arrive Total probable error (0.1%FS) in the transmitter which is around 2.5 times degraded than reference accuracy (0.04% FS).

Another important term, Stability, is a transmitter’s change in output given at fixed input as a function of time. Better long-term stability results in the reduction of periodic Calibration /maintenance and repairs,  which leads to the reduced total cost of ownership.

Case study on Transmitter Accuracy and its stability which will ultimately guide to required calibration frequency.

The intention of this study is not to demonstrate which brand is better, but to educate the fundamental calculation, transmitter performance, and ultimately calibration frequency.

Example:

We use the below specifications for three different make transmitters to calculate their overall performance and calibration frequency interval.

  • Differential Pressure Range: 0-100 inH2O
  • Ambient Temperature range: 40 to 90 oF, Delta is 50 oF
  • Line Static Pressure: 1000 PSIG
  • Acceptable performance: 0.3% of Span

We have to calculate five factors to determine transmitters’ performance, they are.

1. Reference Accuracy of Calibrated Span (E1)

2. Ambient Temperature Effects on Transmitter (E2)

3. Static Pressure Effects (E3)

4. OverPressure Effects (E4)

5. Stability (E5)

So, we have to calculate these five factors for each transmitter make then only we can find their performance.

Yokogawa Transmitter [EJX110A]

Yokogawa Transmitter Span and Range

Calibrated Span 100 inH2O

URL is 400 inH2O

Reference Accuracy of Calibrated Span

Reference Accuracy of Calibrated Span

E1 = 0.04*100%

E1 = 0.04 inH2O

Ambient Temperature Effects on Transmitter

Ambient Temperature Effects on Transmitter

E2 = ± (0.04*100% + 0.009*400%)

E2 = ± 0.076 inH2O

Static Pressure Effects

Static Pressure Effects on Transmitter

E3 = ± 0.075*100%

E3 = ± 0.075 inH2O

OverPressure Effects

OverPressure Effects

E5 = ± 0.03*400%

E5 = ± 0.12 inH2O

Stability

Stability Factor of Transmitter

Stability per month = 0.1%*400/(15*12)

Stability per month = ± 0.002222 inH2O

Stability per month = ± 0.002222 %of Span

Total Probable Error (TPE)

Total Probable Error

TPE = SQRT((0.04)^2+(0.076)^2+(0.075)^2)

TPE = 0.114022 inH2O

TPE = 0.114022 %of Span

Zero Error on static line pressure effect is not included.

Calibration Frequency

Calibration frequency

Calibration frequency = (0.3 – 0.114022) / 0.002222

Calibration frequency = 83.69847 Months

Calibration frequency = 6.974872 Years

Total Accuracy

Total Accuracy of Transmitter

TA = SQRT((0.04)^2+(0.076)^2+(0.075+0.08)^2+(0.12)^2)

TA = 0.214012 inH2O

TA = 0.214012 %of Span

Zero Error on static line pressure effect & Overpressure effects is included.

Similarly, calculate these factors for another two different transmitters.

Emerson Transmitter [3051CD]

Emerson Transmitter Range

Calibrated Span 100 inH2O

URL is 250 inH2O

Measurement Span of Emerson Transmitter

E1 = 0.04 inH2O

E1 = 0.04*100%

Ambient Temperature Effects of Emerson Transmitter

E2 = 0.0125*250% + 0.0625*100%

E2 = 0.09375 inH2O

Line Pressure Effects on Emerson Transmitter

E3 = 0.1*100%

E3 = 0.1 inH2O

E4 = 0.05*250%

E4 = 0.125 inH2O

Long Term Stability of Emerson Transmitter

Stability per month  = 0.2%*250/(10*12)

Stability per month  = 0.004167 inH2O

Stability per month  = 0.004167 %of Span

TPE of Emerson Transmitter

TPE = SQRT((0.04)^2+(0.09375)^2+(0.1)^2)

TPE = 0.14279 inH2O

TPE = 0.14279 %of Span

Zero Error on static line pressure effect is not included.

Calibration frequency = (0.3 – 0.14279) / 0.004167

Calibration frequency = 37.72738 Months

Calibration frequency = 3.143948 Years

There is no data available for an Overpressure effect on Transmitter performance.

3051S model has better accuracy and stability than 3051 Models

Honeywell Transmitter [STD800]

Honeywell Transmitter Range

Calibrated Span 100 inH2O

URL is 400 inH2O

Honeywell Transmitter Accuracy

E1 = 0.0375*100%

E1 = 0.0375 inH2O

Honeywell Transmitter Temperature and Pressure Effects

E2 = (0.025 + 0.007(400/100))

E2 = 0.053 inH2O

E3 = (0.08 + 0.007(400/100))

E3 = 0.108 inH2O

Honeywell Transmitter Stability

Stability per month = 0.01%*400/(15*12)

Stability per month = 0.000222 inH2O

Stability per month = 0.000222 %of Span

Honeywell Transmitter Performance

TPE = SQRT((0.0375)^2+(0.053)^2+(0.108)^2)

TPE = 0.126013 inH2O

TPE = 0.126013 %of Span

It seems that Zero Error on static line pressure effect is not included.

Calibration frequency = (0.3 – 0.126) / 0.0002

Calibration frequency = 870 Months

Calibration frequency = 72.5 Years

Recommended frequency 4 Years

There is no data available for Overpressure effect on Transmitter performance

STD700 model has degraded accuracy and stability than STD800 Models

STD700 series model recommended calibration frequency is 2 Years

Conclusion:

We determined the transmitter performance factors for different makes, and we can choose based on the results.

Author: Jatin Katrodiya

Read Next:

  • Level Transmitter Design
  • Calculate Tolerance of RTD
  • Orifice Beta in 0.3 to 0.7?
  • Instrument Air Compressor
  • Process Variable Damping
Don't Miss Our Updates
Be the first to get exclusive content straight to your email.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
You've successfully subscribed !
Redundant Power Supply for Critical Field Panels
How to Select a pH or ORP Meter
Process Control & Safety Systems Logics Implementing Cycle
Multiple Thermowell Installations Problems
Transmitter Minimum Span, Accuracy & Turndown
Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Copy Link
Share
1 Comment
  • Kaung Khant Ko Ko Han says:
    October 16, 2020 at 8:41 pm

    Great!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

128.3kFollowersLike
69.1kFollowersFollow
208kSubscribersSubscribe
38kFollowersFollow

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Guifty Shimica on Top Non-PLC Certification Courses for Automation Professionals
  • Guifty Shimica on Top Non-PLC Certification Courses for Automation Professionals
  • MIHARITSOA Aina Sitraka on Top Non-PLC Certification Courses for Automation Professionals
  • Vaishnavi on Free Instrumentation Course for Trainee Engineers

Related Articles

Pressure Gauge Problems

Pressure Gauge Problems

Types of Cables

Types of Cables, Purpose, Advantages, Disadvantages, Applications

Cables Sheath Material

Instrument Cables Sheath Material

Instrument Air Sizing

Instrument Air Sizing

Temperature Gauges and Elements Specifications

Temperature Gauges and Elements : Detailed Specifications

Single Line Diagram of UPS System

UPS Selection Factors for a Control System

General Specification of Thermowell

General Specification of Thermowell

Pre-Engineering Design Documents

Industrial Automation Pre-Engineering Design Documents – Project & Process

More Articles

Industrial Automation Systems

Remote Functions in Industrial Control Systems (ICS)

Turbine-Compressor System Architecture

Turbine-Compressor System Architecture

Orifice Beta

Why is Orifice Beta in between 0.3 to 0.7?

Boolean Logic to PLC Programming

Boolean Logic to PLC Programming

HART Communication

HART Communication Protocol Overview

Digital Electronics Multiple Choice Questions

Programmable Array Logic Objective Questions

Van Stone Type Thermowell

Types of Thermowells

p-type-semiconductor

N Type and P Type Semiconductors

Follow US
All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?