Inst ToolsInst ToolsInst Tools
  • Courses
  • Automation
    • PLC
    • Control System
    • Safety System
    • Communication
    • Fire & Gas System
  • Instrumentation
    • Design
    • Pressure
    • Temperature
    • Flow
    • Level
    • Vibration
    • Analyzer
    • Control Valve
    • Switch
    • Calibration
    • Erection & Commissioning
  • Interview
    • Instrumentation
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Practical
  • Q&A
    • Instrumentation
    • Control System
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Analog Electronics
    • Digital Electronics
    • Power Electronics
    • Microprocessor
  • Request
Search
  • Books
  • Software
  • Projects
  • Process
  • Tools
  • Basics
  • Formula
  • Power Plant
  • Root Cause Analysis
  • Electrical Basics
  • Animation
  • Standards
  • 4-20 mA Course
  • Siemens PLC Course
Reading: Major issues for Sensors Selection
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Inst ToolsInst Tools
Font ResizerAa
  • Courses
  • Design
  • PLC
  • Interview
  • Control System
Search
  • Courses
  • Automation
    • PLC
    • Control System
    • Safety System
    • Communication
    • Fire & Gas System
  • Instrumentation
    • Design
    • Pressure
    • Temperature
    • Flow
    • Level
    • Vibration
    • Analyzer
    • Control Valve
    • Switch
    • Calibration
    • Erection & Commissioning
  • Interview
    • Instrumentation
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Practical
  • Q&A
    • Instrumentation
    • Control System
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Analog Electronics
    • Digital Electronics
    • Power Electronics
    • Microprocessor
  • Request
Follow US
All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Inst Tools > Blog > Instrumentation Design > Major issues for Sensors Selection

Major issues for Sensors Selection

Last updated: April 20, 2019 10:02 am
Editorial Staff
Instrumentation Design
No Comments
Share
10 Min Read
SHARE

The major issues in sensor selection are summarized in the following.  The relative importance of each issue depends upon the specific application; for example, one application might require excellent accuracy, while another might require only moderate accuracy, but high reliability.

Generally, we find that the greater the requirements for good performance, the higher the cost for purchase and maintenance.

Therefore, we must find the proper balance of performance and cost, rather than always specify the best performing sensor.

ISSUE COMMENTS
Accuracy – Accuracy is the degree of conformity of the measured value with the accepted standard or ideal value, which we can take as the true physical variable.  Accuracy is usually reported as a range of maximum inaccuracy.  These ranges should have a significance level, such as 95% of the measurements will be within the inaccuracy range.

Accuracy is needed for some variables, such as product quality, but it is not required for others such as level in a large storage tank.  See Section 24.3 in Marlin (2000) for a discussion on the needs of sensor accuracy.

Accuracy is usually expressed in engineering units or as a percentage of the sensor range, for example:

Thermocouple temperature sensor with accuracy of ± 1.5 K.

Orifice flow meters with accuracy of ±3% of maximum flow range.

Repeatability – The closeness of agreement among a number of consecutive measurements of the same variable (value) under the same operating conditions, approaching in the same direction. The term “approaching in the same direction” means that the variable is increasing (decreasing) to the value for all replications of the experiment.
Reproducibility – The closeness of agreement among a number of consecutive measurements of the same variable (value) under the same operating conditions over a period of time, approaching from both directions.  This is usually expressed as non-reproducibility as a percentage of range (span).

Often, an important balance is between accuracy and reproducibility, with the proper choice depending on each process application.

The period of time is “long”, so that changes occurring over longer times of plant operation are included.

Reproducibility includes hysteresis, dead band, drift and repeatability.

Range/Span – Most sensors have a limited range over which a process variable can be measured, defined by the lower and upper range values.  Usually, the larger the range, the poorer the accuracy, and reproducibility.  Therefore, engineers select the smallest range that satisfies the process requirements.

We select ranges that are easily interpreted by operating personnel, such as 100-200 °C, but not 100-183 °C.

If a chemical reactor typically operates at 300 °C, the engineer might select a range of 250-350 °C.

Since the reactor will be started up from ambient temperature occasionally, an additional sensor should be provided with a range of -50 to 400 °C.

Reliability – Reliability is the probability that a device will adequately perform (as specified) for a period of time under specified operating conditions.  Some sensors are required for safety or product quality, and therefore, they should be very reliable.  Reliability is affected by maintenance and consistency with process environment.  Also, some sensors are protected from contact with corrosive process environment by a cover or sheath (e.g., a thermowell for a thermocouple), and some sensors require a sample to be extracted from the process (e.g., a chromatograph). If sensor reliability is very important, the engineer can provide duplicate sensors, so that a single failure does not require a process shutdown.  See Chapter 22 in Marlin (2000) for the use of duplicate sensors in process control.
Linearity – This is the closeness to a straight line of the relationship between the true process variable and the measurement.  Lack of linearity does not necessarily degrade sensor performance.  If the nonlinearity can be modeled and an appropriate correction applied to the measurement before it is used for monitoring and control, the effect of the non-linearity can be eliminated.  Typical examples of compensating calculations are the square root applied to the orifice flow sensor and the polynomial compensation for a thermocouple temperature sensor.  The engineer should not assume that a compensation for non-linearity has been applied, especially when taking values from a history database, which does not contain details of the measurement technology. Linearity is usually reported as non-linearity, which is the maximum of the deviation between the calibration curve and a straight line positioned so that the maximum deviation is minimized.

See ISA (1979) for further details and several alternative definitions of linearity.

Maintenance – Sensors require occasional testing and replacement of selected components that can wear.  Engineers must know the maintenance requirements so that they can provide adequate spare parts and personnel time.  Naturally, the maintenance costs must be included in the economic analysis of a design. On-stream analyzers usually require the greatest amount of maintenance.  The cost associated with maintenance can be substantial and should not be overlooked in the economic analysis.
Consistency with process environment – Most sensors will function properly for specific process conditions.  For example, many flow sensors function for a single phase, but not for multi-phase fluid flow, whether vapor-liquid or slurry.  The engineer must observe the limitations for each sensor.

Some sensors can have direct contact with the process materials, while others must be protected.  Three general categories are given in the following.

  • Direct contact – Sensors such as orifice plates and level floats have direct contact with process fluids.
  • Sheath protection – Sensors such as thermocouples and pressure diaphragms have a sheath between the process fluid and the sensor element.
  • Sample extraction – When the process environment is very hostile or the sensor is delicate and performs a complex physiochemical transformation on the process material, a sample can be extracted.

Naturally, the parts of the sensor that contact the process must be selected appropriately to resist corrosion or other deleterious effects.

A float can indicate the interface for a liquid level.  However, a float is not reliable for a “sticky” liquid.

Also, a turbine flow meter can be damaged by a rapid change in flow rate or liquid entrained in a vapor stream.

Sensors in direct contact must not be degraded by the process material.

The sheath usually slows the sensor response.

Samples must represent the fluid in the process.

Dynamics – The use of the sensor dictates the allowable delay in the sensor response.  When the measured value is used for control, sensor delays should be minimized, while sensors used for monitoring longer-term trends can have some delay. A greater delay is associated with sensors that require a sample to be extracted from the process.

On-stream analyzers usually have the longest delays, which are caused by the time for analysis.

Safety – The sensor and transmitter often require electrical power.  Since the sensor is located at the process equipment, the environment could contain flammable gases, which could explode when a spark occurs. Standards for safety have been developed to prevent explosions.  These standards prevent a significant power source, oxidizing agent and flammable gas from being in contact.
Cost – Engineers must always consider cost when making design and operations decisions.  Sensors involve costs and when selected properly, provide benefits.  These must be quantified and a profitability analysis performed.

In some cases, a sensor can affect the operating costs of the process.  An example is a flow sensor.  In some situations, the pumping (or compression) costs can be high, and the pressure drop occurring because of the sensor can significantly increase the pumping costs.  In such situations, a flow sensor with a low (non-recoverable) pressure drop is selected.

Remember that the total cost includes costs of transmission (wiring around the plant), installation, documentation, plant operations, and maintenance over the life of the sensor.

See a reference on engineering economics to learn how to consider costs over time, using principles of the time value of money and profitability measures.

Don't Miss Our Updates
Be the first to get exclusive content straight to your email.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
You've successfully subscribed !

Continue Reading

Difference between DCS & PLC Systems
Instrument Air Quality
Location of Measurement Displays
Steam Tracing
Tagging Philosophy for Junction Box, Cable, and Cable Drum
Electrical and Instrumentation – Automation Pre-engineering Documents
Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Copy Link
Share
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

128.3kFollowersLike
69.1kFollowersFollow
210kSubscribersSubscribe
38kFollowersFollow

Categories

Explore More

Orifice Flow Meters: Detailed Specifications
Process Control & Safety Systems Logics Implementing Cycle
Detail Design Engineering Competency Aspects
Why Orifice Flow Meter Flange is Not Recommended 150# Rating?
How O-Ring Failure caused NASA’s shuttle to Blast ?
Instrument Numbering Philosophy
Field Instruments Selection Aid
How to Select an Actuator for Valve

Keep Learning

Power Supply Voltage Regulator Problem

Troubleshooting a Power Supply Circuit

Explain operation of the circuit

Explain Operation of the Lamp Circuit ?

Technical Specification for Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) System

Technical Specification for Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) System

Relay Motor Logic Circuit

Motor Control Circuits

Analog signal with noise

Signal Coupling and Cable Separation

Control Room Design Guidelines

Control Room Design Guidelines

Blast Furnace Panel Modification to Reduce Down Time

Blast Furnace Panel Modification to Reduce Down Time by 60 to 70%

How to Select a Flow Meter

How to Select a Flow Meter

Learn More

Trip Valve Shown Tripped

Trip Valve Principle

Differential Pressure Transmitter Zero Suppression

Basics of DP Transmitter Suppression and Elevation

MCQ on Measurement and Instrumentation

250+ Electronic Measurements and Instrumentation MCQ Questions

Series Parallel Circuit Analysis

Series – Parallel Circuit Analysis

IP Ratings and Equivalent NEMA Ratings

IP Ratings and Equivalent NEMA Ratings

Instrument Process Datasheet

Instrument Process Datasheet (IPDS)

Nonlinear Control Systems

Stability of Nonlinear System

FIFO in STL Language in Siemens PLC

How to Code a FIFO Queue in STL Language in Siemens PLC?

Menu

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright

Quick Links

  • Learn PLC
  • Helping Hand
  • Part Time Job

YouTube Subscribe

Follow US
All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?