Industrial automation has majorly two kinds of systems – process, and machine.
Process automation can be termed as systems like food and beverage, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, HVAC, etc. where it has many cycles in operation and is a step-by-step one. Basically, it means slower processes, where a control variable needs to be maintained properly, gradually, and steadily.
Machine automation can be termed as systems like cutting machines, printing machines, labeling machines, etc. where it is quick in operation and production time is very less to get higher output.
So, be it any automation, there are two types of controllers in it – PLC and motion controller.
PLC can be used for both the process and machine automation, but for machine automation, motion controllers are the most preferred.
In this post, we will learn the difference between PLC and motion controller.
PLC’s full form is the Programmable Logic Controller. It has a processor, memory, IO modules for hardware interfacing, and communication modules to interface real-world inputs and outputs with it and process the same. This will control the outputs accordingly.
There are five types of software languages used in it for programming – ladder logic, structured text, functional block diagram, instruction list, and sequential flow chart. These languages can be used to write programs in PLC accordingly and process the logic.
PLCs have the benefit of being familiar (both in terms of hardware and software) to machine programmers and technicians, making them simple to program, diagnose, and service.
But, PLCs are limited in some storage, processing speed, and libraries. It cannot execute very fast applications with ease and accuracy; yes it can be done in PLC but will require a lot of programming and complex coding to do the same.
Also, the wiring restrictions in PLC, limit its capability to communicate swiftly with high-speed machines like robots and axis-motion. (For a complex machine)
The motion controller is also termed a PAC (programmable automation controller). It can execute higher-level instructions. As the name implies, a motion controller can handle all motion-related tasks with ease and comfort.
The motion controller is dedicated to motion control, making its motion capabilities much more expansive than that of the PLC. These machine architectures tend to integrate powerful processors and high-speed process execution and data acquisition.
Motion Controllers also offer several advantages in terms of motion performance, such as greater repeatability, velocity control, and settling time. It can easily integrate with servo drives, robots, optical sensors, high-speed camera sensors, and axis-motion machines.
Two things differentiate them from PLC – open architecture (can be used with any third-party device) and modular design (can handle a large number of IOs).
The main differences between PLC and Motion Controllers are as follows.
If you liked this article, then please subscribe to our YouTube Channel for Instrumentation, Electrical, PLC, and SCADA video tutorials.
You can also follow us on Facebook and Twitter to receive daily updates.
Read Next:
The conveyor sorting machine is widely used in the packing industries using the PLC program…
Learn the example of flip-flop PLC program for lamps application using the ladder logic to…
In this article, you will learn the STAR DELTA programming using PLC controller to start…
Lube oil consoles of rotary equipment packages in industrial process plants are usually equipped with…
Rotating equipment packages such as pumps, compressors, turbines need the lube oil consoles for their…
This article explains how to blink lights in ladder logic with a detailed explanation video…