When specifying a flow meter, **accuracy** is a necessary requirement, but it is also essential to select a **flow meter** with sufficient range for the application.

‘Turndown’ or ‘**turndown ratio**’, ‘effective range’ or ‘rangeability’ are all terms used to describe the range of flow rates over which the flow meter will work within the accuracy and repeatability of the tolerances.

## Flow Meter Turndown Ratio

**Example :**

#### A particular steam system has a demand pattern as shown in below Figure. The flow meter has been sized to meet the maximum expected flow rate of 1 000 kg/h.

The turndown of the flow meter selected is given as 4:1. i.e. The claimed accuracy of the flow meter can be met at a minimum flow rate of 1000 ÷ 4 = 250 kg/h.

When the steam flow rate is lower than this, the flow meter cannot meet its specification, so large flow errors occur. At best, the recorded flows below 250 kg/h are inaccurate – at worst they are not recorded at all, and are ‘lost’.

**Also Read : Importance of Flow Meter Accuracy**

In the example shown in Figure, ‘lost flow’ is shown to amount to more than 700 kg of steam over an 8 hour period. The total amount of steam used during this time is approximately 2700 kg, so the ‘lost’ amount represents an additional 30% of total steam use. Had the steam flowmeter been specified with an appropriate turndown capability, the steam flow to the process could have been more accurately measured and costed.

If steam flow is to be accurately metered, the user must make every effort to build up a true and complete assessment of demand, and then specify a flowmeter with:

- The capacity to meet maximum demand.
- A turndown sufficiently large to encompass all anticipated flow variations.

Source : spiraxsarco

## 2 comments

Turn down is related to accuracy of measurement, but rangeability correspond to the capability of the instrument to measure the minimum value however accuracy will not come in picture.

Accuracy at turndown must be stated in % of rate. If stated at % Full Scale it is totally misleading. For example accuracy of 1% full scale, at full scale is 1%. Accuracy of the same device at 10% of full scale is 10%!!