Inst ToolsInst ToolsInst Tools
  • Courses
  • Automation
    • PLC
    • Control System
    • Safety System
    • Communication
    • Fire & Gas System
  • Instrumentation
    • Design
    • Pressure
    • Temperature
    • Flow
    • Level
    • Vibration
    • Analyzer
    • Control Valve
    • Switch
    • Calibration
    • Erection & Commissioning
  • Interview
    • Instrumentation
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Practical
  • Q&A
    • Instrumentation
    • Control System
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Analog Electronics
    • Digital Electronics
    • Power Electronics
    • Microprocessor
  • Request
Search
  • Books
  • Software
  • Projects
  • Process
  • Tools
  • Basics
  • Formula
  • Power Plant
  • Root Cause Analysis
  • Electrical Basics
  • Animation
  • Standards
  • 4-20 mA Course
  • Siemens PLC Course
Reading: Why Counter-current Heat Exchangers are better than Co-current?
Share
Font ResizerAa
Inst ToolsInst Tools
Font ResizerAa
  • Courses
  • Design
  • PLC
  • Interview
  • Control System
Search
  • Courses
  • Automation
    • PLC
    • Control System
    • Safety System
    • Communication
    • Fire & Gas System
  • Instrumentation
    • Design
    • Pressure
    • Temperature
    • Flow
    • Level
    • Vibration
    • Analyzer
    • Control Valve
    • Switch
    • Calibration
    • Erection & Commissioning
  • Interview
    • Instrumentation
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Practical
  • Q&A
    • Instrumentation
    • Control System
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Analog Electronics
    • Digital Electronics
    • Power Electronics
    • Microprocessor
  • Request
Follow US
All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Inst Tools > Blog > Process > Why Counter-current Heat Exchangers are better than Co-current?

Why Counter-current Heat Exchangers are better than Co-current?

The counter-current heat exchanger is more efficient and better (in the same size) than the co-current is from the thermal driving force.

Last updated: May 8, 2021 12:55 pm
Editorial Staff
Process
No Comments
Share
3 Min Read
SHARE

In general, engineers always try to design counter-current heat exchangers, unless for layout issues that force them to choose co-current ones.

Why Counter-current Heat Exchangers are better than Co-currents

This article tries to take a brief look at this question by using HYSYS and Tema standards.

Tema standard introduces the below formula to size a heat exchanger:

A = Q / ( U.f.LMTD)      ……equation (1)

In which

A = Required effective outside heat transfer surface, m²

U = Overall heat transfer coefficient, W. m-2. K-1

Q = Total heat to be transferred, W

LMTD= logarithmic mean temperature difference

f = LMTD correction factor.

Tema says that LMTD is:  equation (2)

Heat exchanger Tema standard formula

Where:

GTTD = Greater Terminal Temperature Difference.

LTTD = Lesser Terminal Temperature Difference.

But GTTD and LTTD are different in co-current and counter-current heat exchangers. In the image below these terms are defined for both.

Co-current and counter-current heat exchangers

According to the fist formula (1), for the same duty Q if the LMTD increases, the required surface A will decrease that will result in reduced cost.

It is exactly here that we can find the answer of the main question. Generally, the LMTD of the counter current heat exchanger is bigger than the co-current.

In the example below solved by HYSYS, you can see that the LMTD of counter-current type is bigger and therefore the AU (required surface “A” multiplied by coefficient “U”) is lower than the co-current type values in the same situation.

Heat Exchanger Worksheet
Heat Exchanger Performance

Thermal Driving Force

Another way to explain why the counter-current exchanger is more efficient (in the same size) than the co-current, is by looking at the definition of the thermal driving force.

The temperature difference is the driving force for heat transfer. There is always a big and homogenous temperature difference between two fluids in a counter-current heat exchanger but this difference of temperature is very low in the case of co-current exchangers at the end of the exchanger where two fluids exit.

Author: Hanif Yazdani

If you liked this article, then please subscribe to our YouTube Channel for Instrumentation, Electrical, PLC, and SCADA video tutorials.

You can also follow us on Facebook and Twitter to receive daily updates.

Read Next:

  • NPT, NPTF, BSPP, and BSPT
  • Electric Motor Actuator Parts
  • Heat Exchanger Temperature Control
  • Information on the Pressure Gauge Dial
  • Why we use Wheatstone bridge in RTD?
Don't Miss Our Updates
Be the first to get exclusive content straight to your email.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
You've successfully subscribed !

Continue Reading

Types of Heat Exchangers
Demineralizers
Hydraulic System
143 Process Control Terms and Glossary – Questions Answers
Ball Float Steam Trap
Flare Knockout Drums Working Animation
Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Copy Link
Share
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

128.3kFollowersLike
69.1kFollowersFollow
210kSubscribersSubscribe
38kFollowersFollow

Categories

Explore More

Components of Water Treatment Plant
Backwashing
Compressor Anti-Surge Control near-miss incident
Reciprocating Compressors
Strainers
Membrane Bioreactor in Water Treatment – MBR Process
Concept of Desuperheater
Oil and Gas Interview Questions Answers

Keep Learning

Difference between Orifice & Restriction Orifice

Moisture Separator

Inhouse Moisture separator for Pneumatic Systems

Deep-Bed Filter

Deep-Bed Filters

desuperheater

Desuperheater Design

Superheated Steam Temperature Control System

Superheated Steam Temperature Control System

Rotary Liquid Seal Ring Air Compressor

Rotary Compressors

Y Strainer

What is a Y Strainer ?

Water Treatment Plant

Water Treatment Plant

Learn More

V1000 Family Programming Simulator Tool

VFD Simulator Download – Free Yaskawa V1000 Software

D flip flop in PLC

D Flip Flop PLC Ladder Logic

MOSFET VI Characteristics

Power MOSFET

Basics of Explosion Protection

Basics of Explosion Protection

Four Wire Current Loop

4-wire Transmitters Current Loops

desuperheater

Concept of Desuperheater

How to Check the Continuity of Protective Conductors

How to Check the Continuity of Protective Conductors?

Wood Sawing and Blower System PLC Control Design

Wood Sawing and Blower System: PLC Control Design

Menu

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright

Quick Links

  • Learn PLC
  • Helping Hand
  • Part Time Job

YouTube Subscribe

Follow US
All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?