Inst ToolsInst ToolsInst Tools
  • Courses
  • Automation
    • PLC
    • Control System
    • Safety System
    • Communication
    • Fire & Gas System
  • Instrumentation
    • Design
    • Pressure
    • Temperature
    • Flow
    • Level
    • Vibration
    • Analyzer
    • Control Valve
    • Switch
    • Calibration
    • Erection & Commissioning
  • Interview
    • Instrumentation
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Practical
  • Q&A
    • Instrumentation
    • Control System
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Analog Electronics
    • Digital Electronics
    • Power Electronics
    • Microprocessor
  • Request
Search
  • Books
  • Software
  • Projects
  • Process
  • Tools
  • Basics
  • Formula
  • Power Plant
  • Root Cause Analysis
  • Electrical Basics
  • Animation
  • Standards
  • 4-20 mA Course
  • Siemens PLC Course
Reading: How to Calculate Transmitter Performance and Calibration Frequency?
Share
Font ResizerAa
Inst ToolsInst Tools
Font ResizerAa
  • Courses
  • Design
  • PLC
  • Interview
  • Control System
Search
  • Courses
  • Automation
    • PLC
    • Control System
    • Safety System
    • Communication
    • Fire & Gas System
  • Instrumentation
    • Design
    • Pressure
    • Temperature
    • Flow
    • Level
    • Vibration
    • Analyzer
    • Control Valve
    • Switch
    • Calibration
    • Erection & Commissioning
  • Interview
    • Instrumentation
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Practical
  • Q&A
    • Instrumentation
    • Control System
    • Electrical
    • Electronics
    • Analog Electronics
    • Digital Electronics
    • Power Electronics
    • Microprocessor
  • Request
Follow US
All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Inst Tools > Blog > Instrumentation Design > How to Calculate Transmitter Performance and Calibration Frequency?

How to Calculate Transmitter Performance and Calibration Frequency?

Last updated: September 28, 2022 12:40 pm
Jatin Katrodiya
Instrumentation Design
1 Comment
Share
6 Min Read
SHARE

The overall performance of the transmitter is defined by the Total Probable Error (TPE).

Contents
Transmitter Calibration FrequencyYokogawa TransmitterReference Accuracy of Calibrated SpanAmbient Temperature Effects on TransmitterStatic Pressure EffectsOverPressure EffectsStabilityTotal Probable Error (TPE)Calibration FrequencyTotal AccuracyEmerson TransmitterHoneywell Transmitter

TPE is the accuracy of the instrument in installed/actual conditions.

Transmitter Calibration Frequency

Transmitter Performance and Calibration Frequency

TPE is made up of four things:

1. Reference accuracy

This is to be calculated at calibrated Span.

2. Ambient temperature effects

Transmitters are factory calibrated at room temperature. If a transmitter operates at a different ambient temperature, the electronics perform differently, and a measurement error may result.)

3. Line Pressure Effects

Line pressure effect errors occur when diaphragms are altered under static pressure. Normally Manufacturers will define the performance affected due to every 1000 PSIG pressure changes.

There is zero and span effect due to static Line pressure. some vendor claims that zero effect can be eliminated by Zero Trim when it is performed under static pressure condition.

4. Some manufacturer defines Transmitter performance is affected by Overpressure up to 250 bar.

If the performance does not meet the minimum requirements, then the transmitter might not be a good fit for the application.

The below sample calculation performed to arrive Total probable error (0.1%FS) in the transmitter which is around 2.5 times degraded than reference accuracy (0.04% FS).

Another important term, Stability, is a transmitter’s change in output given at fixed input as a function of time. Better long-term stability results in the reduction of periodic Calibration /maintenance and repairs,  which leads to the reduced total cost of ownership.

Case study on Transmitter Accuracy and its stability which will ultimately guide to required calibration frequency.

The intention of this study is not to demonstrate which brand is better, but to educate the fundamental calculation, transmitter performance, and ultimately calibration frequency.

Example:

We use the below specifications for three different make transmitters to calculate their overall performance and calibration frequency interval.

  • Differential Pressure Range: 0-100 inH2O
  • Ambient Temperature range: 40 to 90 oF, Delta is 50 oF
  • Line Static Pressure: 1000 PSIG
  • Acceptable performance: 0.3% of Span

We have to calculate five factors to determine transmitters’ performance, they are.

1. Reference Accuracy of Calibrated Span (E1)

2. Ambient Temperature Effects on Transmitter (E2)

3. Static Pressure Effects (E3)

4. OverPressure Effects (E4)

5. Stability (E5)

So, we have to calculate these five factors for each transmitter make then only we can find their performance.

Yokogawa Transmitter [EJX110A]

Yokogawa Transmitter Span and Range

Calibrated Span 100 inH2O

URL is 400 inH2O

Reference Accuracy of Calibrated Span

Reference Accuracy of Calibrated Span

E1 = 0.04*100%

E1 = 0.04 inH2O

Ambient Temperature Effects on Transmitter

Ambient Temperature Effects on Transmitter

E2 = ± (0.04*100% + 0.009*400%)

E2 = ± 0.076 inH2O

Static Pressure Effects

Static Pressure Effects on Transmitter

E3 = ± 0.075*100%

E3 = ± 0.075 inH2O

OverPressure Effects

OverPressure Effects

E5 = ± 0.03*400%

E5 = ± 0.12 inH2O

Stability

Stability Factor of Transmitter

Stability per month = 0.1%*400/(15*12)

Stability per month = ± 0.002222 inH2O

Stability per month = ± 0.002222 %of Span

Total Probable Error (TPE)

Total Probable Error

TPE = SQRT((0.04)^2+(0.076)^2+(0.075)^2)

TPE = 0.114022 inH2O

TPE = 0.114022 %of Span

Zero Error on static line pressure effect is not included.

Calibration Frequency

Calibration frequency

Calibration frequency = (0.3 – 0.114022) / 0.002222

Calibration frequency = 83.69847 Months

Calibration frequency = 6.974872 Years

Total Accuracy

Total Accuracy of Transmitter

TA = SQRT((0.04)^2+(0.076)^2+(0.075+0.08)^2+(0.12)^2)

TA = 0.214012 inH2O

TA = 0.214012 %of Span

Zero Error on static line pressure effect & Overpressure effects is included.

Similarly, calculate these factors for another two different transmitters.

Emerson Transmitter [3051CD]

Emerson Transmitter Range

Calibrated Span 100 inH2O

URL is 250 inH2O

Measurement Span of Emerson Transmitter

E1 = 0.04 inH2O

E1 = 0.04*100%

Ambient Temperature Effects of Emerson Transmitter

E2 = 0.0125*250% + 0.0625*100%

E2 = 0.09375 inH2O

Line Pressure Effects on Emerson Transmitter

E3 = 0.1*100%

E3 = 0.1 inH2O

E4 = 0.05*250%

E4 = 0.125 inH2O

Long Term Stability of Emerson Transmitter

Stability per month  = 0.2%*250/(10*12)

Stability per month  = 0.004167 inH2O

Stability per month  = 0.004167 %of Span

TPE of Emerson Transmitter

TPE = SQRT((0.04)^2+(0.09375)^2+(0.1)^2)

TPE = 0.14279 inH2O

TPE = 0.14279 %of Span

Zero Error on static line pressure effect is not included.

Calibration frequency = (0.3 – 0.14279) / 0.004167

Calibration frequency = 37.72738 Months

Calibration frequency = 3.143948 Years

There is no data available for an Overpressure effect on Transmitter performance.

3051S model has better accuracy and stability than 3051 Models

Honeywell Transmitter [STD800]

Honeywell Transmitter Range

Calibrated Span 100 inH2O

URL is 400 inH2O

Honeywell Transmitter Accuracy

E1 = 0.0375*100%

E1 = 0.0375 inH2O

Honeywell Transmitter Temperature and Pressure Effects

E2 = (0.025 + 0.007(400/100))

E2 = 0.053 inH2O

E3 = (0.08 + 0.007(400/100))

E3 = 0.108 inH2O

Honeywell Transmitter Stability

Stability per month = 0.01%*400/(15*12)

Stability per month = 0.000222 inH2O

Stability per month = 0.000222 %of Span

Honeywell Transmitter Performance

TPE = SQRT((0.0375)^2+(0.053)^2+(0.108)^2)

TPE = 0.126013 inH2O

TPE = 0.126013 %of Span

It seems that Zero Error on static line pressure effect is not included.

Calibration frequency = (0.3 – 0.126) / 0.0002

Calibration frequency = 870 Months

Calibration frequency = 72.5 Years

Recommended frequency 4 Years

There is no data available for Overpressure effect on Transmitter performance

STD700 model has degraded accuracy and stability than STD800 Models

STD700 series model recommended calibration frequency is 2 Years

Conclusion:

We determined the transmitter performance factors for different makes, and we can choose based on the results.

Author: Jatin Katrodiya

Read Next:

  • Level Transmitter Design
  • Calculate Tolerance of RTD
  • Orifice Beta in 0.3 to 0.7?
  • Instrument Air Compressor
  • Process Variable Damping
Don't Miss Our Updates
Be the first to get exclusive content straight to your email.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
You've successfully subscribed !

Continue Reading

Flow Instruments – Selection, Principle & Application
4-20 mA Loop Splitter
Pneumatic Piping Design and Specification
Load Cell Design
Ferrules and Cross Ferruling
Electrical and Instrumentation – Automation Pre-engineering Documents
Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Copy Link
Share
1 Comment
  • Kaung Khant Ko Ko Han says:
    October 16, 2020 at 8:41 pm

    Great!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

128.3kFollowersLike
69.1kFollowersFollow
210kSubscribersSubscribe
38kFollowersFollow

Categories

Explore More

Level Gauge Design
Instrumentation Engineer Activities & Documents – Detail Design Phase
How to Select a Rotameter? – Parameters and Applications
What is Contact bounce ?
All About Turbine Meters
15 Loop Diagram Questions
Interface Level Measurement Selection Guide
Guided Wave Radar Level Sensor Pressure and Temperature Effects

Keep Learning

Explain operation of the circuit

Explain Operation of the Lamp Circuit ?

Control Valve Packing

Control Valve Packing

sinking-and-sourcing-digital-output-modules

PLC Digital Signals Wiring Techniques

Instrument Protection Methods: Seals

Normally closed input actuator as stop button.

Normally-Closed Contacts for Stop Buttons

Thermowell Design Guidelines

Pneumatic Signal Piping and Fittings

Pneumatic Signal Piping and Fittings

Instrumentation Design Details

I&C Engineer Roles & Responsibilities – Instrumentation Design

Learn More

Differential Pressure Transmitter Manifold

Field Instrument Calibration Errors

Electrical Machines Questions and Answers

Synchronous Machines Power Factor Control Questions

Digital Electronics Multiple Choice Questions

Register-Transistor Logic (RTL) Objective Questions

Mass Spectrometer Questions and Answers

Gas Chromatograph- Mass Spectrometer

Half-Wave Rectifier Circuit

Half-Wave Rectifier Circuit

Absolute and Gauge Pressure

Difference Between Absolute and Gauge Pressure

Capacitor Bank

Poor Power Factor Boosted – Industrial Electrical Problems

refrigeration compressors

Why is CO2 the Most Promising Refrigerant in Cooling Industry?

Menu

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright

Quick Links

  • Learn PLC
  • Helping Hand
  • Part Time Job

YouTube Subscribe

Follow US
All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?